About:

Chris Geidner is the author of Law Dork, a Substack publication that covers topics such as the Supreme Court, law, and politics. The publication has tens of thousands of subscribers.

Website:

Specializations:

Subscribe to RSS:
The use of military lawyers in civilian prosecutions in Minnesota is challenged as a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, raising concerns about civilian authority.
The Supreme Court's conservative majority reinstated a California injunction against gender-identity protections for students and blocked a New York ruling on voting rights, raising significant concerns.
A federal judge in Minnesota has halted the Trump administration's policy to detain refugees, citing violations of the Refugee Act and constitutional rights.
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's efforts to erase historical truths about George Washington's slavery from Independence National Historical Park, emphasizing the importance of accurate history.
The justification for masks by immigration agents reveals the Trump administration's broader strategy of operating in secrecy to evade accountability for its actions.
Judicial rulings from the D.C. District Court demonstrate a strong pushback against the Trump administration's executive overreach and a commitment to uphold constitutional rights.
Minnesota refugees are suing the Trump administration over warrantless detentions, seeking transparency and protection of their rights amid ongoing legal battles.
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's appointment of Kari Lake as acting CEO of the U.S. Agency for Global Media was unconstitutional and violated federal law.
The DOJ's unexpected reversal on law firm appeal dismissals raises concerns about the administration's legal strategy and potential implications for future cases.
The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision invalidates Trump's tariffs, asserting that such powers require explicit congressional authorization under the IEEPA.
The DOJ's recent actions indicate a significant decline in its effectiveness and adherence to legal standards, raising concerns about its current operational integrity.
Law Dork seeks greater public access to court filings in a Minnesota refugee case, arguing that current access is insufficient for public interest and legal support.
Judge Lamberth is contemplating civil contempt against Trump officials for retaliating against transgender inmates, emphasizing the need for enforcement of court orders.
A federal judge is holding a prison warden accountable for alleged retaliation against a transgender inmate involved in a lawsuit against the Trump administration.
The Trump administration faces allegations of retaliating against a transgender inmate, violating a court order, and prompting a motion for civil contempt.
The Supreme Court's ruling denies GEO Group's claim for immunity, reinforcing accountability for federal contractors in immigration detention cases.
Maine residents are suing the Trump administration for allegedly retaliating against those recording immigration enforcement, claiming violations of their First Amendment rights.
DHS's Operation PARRIS targets 5,600 Minnesota refugees for legal status review, based on a controversial rescission of prior guidance, facing legal challenges.
Charles 'Sonny' Burton, an innocent man facing execution in Alabama, exemplifies the flaws in the felony-murder rule and the urgent need for clemency from Governor Kay Ivey.
The Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi has become a tool for President Trump, reflecting a significant shift in its operational integrity and independence.
DHS officials released a memo justifying the detention of refugees lacking lawful permanent resident status, raising legal and ethical concerns amid ongoing litigation.
The Supreme Court's new rule requiring stock ticker symbols in filings highlights ethical issues surrounding justices' stock ownership, particularly that of Chief Justice John Roberts.
The Supreme Court will hear cases on the Trump administration's attempts to revoke temporary protected status for immigrants from Syria and Haiti, with a ruling expected by late June.
The new DOJ policy restricts transgender care in federal prisons, raising legal and ethical concerns about the treatment of trans inmates.