About:

James N. Anderson shares thoughts on theology, philosophy, and apologetics on his blog.

Website:

Specializations:

Interests:

Theology Philosophy Apologetics

Incoming Links:

Subscribe to RSS:
The post defends Richard B. Gaffin, Jr.'s theological exegesis against criticisms regarding his epistemological approach, highlighting Brian Mattson's supportive arguments.
The post critiques Yuval Noah Harari's views on sexual liberation and Darwinism, arguing that his interpretation of Darwin's ideas leads to problematic implications regarding morality and rationality. It contends that if biologica...
The blog post discusses the relationship between religion and civil government, emphasizing the need for a thoughtful Christian perspective on this topic. It endorses James Baird's book 'King of Kings: A Reformed Guide to Christia...
The article discusses the relationship between logic and evidence for God, arguing that the laws of logic are evidence for a transcendent rational mind behind the cosmos, and that a Christian theistic worldview can account for the...
The text discusses the distinction between 'classical Christian theism' and 'theistic mutualism' as defined by James Dolezal in his book 'All That Is in God'. The author argues that John Frame is not a theistic mutualist, as Dolez...
Michael Preciado critiques Richard Muller's understanding of compatibilism and determinism, arguing that Muller's lack of interaction with contemporary compatibilism leads to misunderstandings of the Reformed Orthodox views on fre...
The text discusses the perception of the God of the Old Testament as violent and hateful, as argued by atheists like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. It addresses the accusations of genocide, cruelty, and megalomania agai...
The blog post discusses the problem of bad behavior among Christians and how it poses a challenge to the truth of Christianity. The author explores the moral objections to Christianity and the behavior of Christians throughout his...
The blog post discusses the objection to Christianity that modern science has made belief in God unnecessary. It addresses the conflict thesis and the charge that Christian doctrines conflict with scientific theories. The post als...
...
Alvin Plantinga discusses the responsibility of Christian philosophers to the Lord and the Christian community, and the courage and confidence required to fulfill this responsibility.
The blog post discusses the trustworthiness of the Bible and the challenges of believing in it in a modern skeptical world. It highlights a book by Timothy Paul Jones that addresses these challenges and provides a space for authen...
The blog post discusses the problem of hell and how it is reconciled with the goodness and mercy of God. It addresses the questions of how a loving God could send anyone to hell and provides a biblical perspective on the doctrine ...
The author provides an update on The Big Ten series, which he has been co-editing with Greg Welty for Christian Focus. He lists the eight published volumes and mentions that the final two entries are in the pipeline. He expresses ...
The author discusses the defense of the authorial model of divine providence in response to the charge that it makes God the 'author of evil.' He presents a four-case defense to neutralize objections and responds to five objection...
The author presents an epistemological argument against Naturalism, arguing that if Naturalism is true, then all factual knowledge is acquired empirically, but we have some knowledge of necessary facts, so Naturalism is not true. ...
The blog post discusses the best defenders of atheism and the strongest defenses of atheism. The author argues that the New Atheists are not the best and the brightest of contemporary atheists, and that the most sophisticated and ...
The blog post discusses the origin of the term 'transcendental argument' and its use in contemporary literature. It explores the potential origins of the term, attributing it to Cornelius Van Til, and compares it to the work of ot...